Patrick Kline
Patrick Kline is a Professor of Economics at University California Berkeley and an NBER faculty research associate. His research focuses on the determinants of wage inequality and the effectiveness of public policies designed to combat inequality. He is a leading expert on the economics of imperfectly competitive labour markets, place-based policies, and program evaluation methods. He is the recipient of the Sherwin Rosen Prize, and most recently the 2021 IZA Young Labour Economist Award for his outstanding contribution in research on empirical methodology and labour economics.
Patrick delivered the third Wealth of Nations Lecture digitally on Zoom Webinar. He presented his recent work on 'Systemic Discrimination Among Large US Employers”

Patrick delivered his presentation live from Panmure House virtually.
ABSTRACT
We study the results of a massive nationwide correspondence experiment sending more than 83,000 fictitious applications with randomized characteristics to geographically dispersed jobs posted by 108 of the largest U.S. employers. Distinctively Black names reduce the probability of employer contact by 2.1 percentage points relative to distinctively white names. The magnitude of this racial gap in contact rates differs substantially across firms, exhibiting a between-company standard deviation of 1.9 percentage points. Despite an insignificant average gap in contact rates between male and female applicants, we find a between-company standard deviation in gender contact gaps of 2.7 percentage points, revealing that some firms favor male applicants while others favor women. Company-specific racial contact gaps are temporally and spatially persistent and negatively correlated with firm profitability, federal contractor status, and a measure of recruiting centralization. Discrimination exhibits little geographical dispersion, but two-digit industry explains roughly half of the cross-firm variation in both racial and gender contact gaps. Contact gaps are highly concentrated in particular companies, with firms in the top quintile of racial discrimination responsible for nearly half of lost contacts to Black applicants in the experiment. Controlling false discovery rates to the 5% level, 23 individual companies are found to discriminate against Black applicants. Our findings establish that systemic illegal discrimination is concentrated among a select set of large employers, many of which can be identified with high confidence using large-scale inference methods.